SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1986 Supreme(Pat) 224

S.SHAMSUL HASAN
Kedarnath Singh – Appellant
Versus
Narendra Mohan Singh – Respondent


Judgment

S.Shamsul Hasan, J.

1. This is an appeal by the plaintiff seeking effacement of a deed of conveyance made in favour of the sole defendant-respondent, Kirpa Narain Singh, (since dead) by the wife of Bachchu Singh, Mt. Adhirajo Kuar. The plaintiff-appellant is the nephew of Bachchu Singh.

2. The case of the plaintiff is based on a will executed by Bachchu Singh in the year, 1950 in favour of Mt. Adhirajo Kuar and probated in the year, 1966. By this will, according to the plaintiff-appellant, Mt. Adhirajo Kuar was granted life interest in the property by the executant of the will and on her demise the property was to revert to the plaintiff-appellant, Kedarnath Singh, the nephew of the executant of the will.

3. The defendant-respondent (since dead) was the transferee from Mt. Adhirajo Kuar and based his claim and right created by the Hindu Succession Act, 1956 . by which she became the absolute owner of the property.

4. The point of law framed is as follows:-

Whether the court of appeal below has not committed an error of law in holding that properties bequeathed to Most. Adhirajo Kuar under a will executed by her husband giving only a life interest will not control her right







Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top