SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1986 Supreme(Pat) 367

RAM NARESH THAKUR, PHANI BHUSHAN PRASAD
Sudarshan Ahir Alias Yadav – Appellant
Versus
State Of Bihar – Respondent


Judgment

Ram Naresh Thakur, Phani Bhushan Prasad, JJ.

1. All the four appellants have been convicted under Sec.302/34 of the Indian Penal Code for committing the murder of Kedar Upadhya and each of them has been sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for life. Appellants Sudarshan Ahir and jatadhari Ahir have been further convicted under Sec.27 of the Arms Act and sentenced to suffer rigorous imprisonment for three years each. The sentences awarded to these two appellants under the aforesaid two counts have been directed to run concurrently.

2. The prosecution story, as told by P. W.12, is that on 3rd June, 1980, his cousin Kedar Upadhya had gone to village yar at about 4.30 p. m. for bringing his cow which he had entrusted to devi Dayal (D. W.1) for grazing. The informant (P. W.12) and his nephew hira Shankar Upadhya (P. W.5), the son of the deceased, were casing in a field at about 6.30 p m. At that very time they found Kedar Upadhya returning from the side of village Yar. When Kedar upadhya reached near the Karha which is in the north of a well of his village, these appellants came there all of a sudden from the side of Rehat and surrounded the deceased. They all started assa
















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top