SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1987 Supreme(Pat) 118

U.P.SINGH
Bhulendra Ram – Appellant
Versus
State Of Bihar – Respondent


Judgment

U. P. Singh, J.

1. Both these appeals arise out of a common judgment passed by the trial court. They have been heard together and are being disposed of by this common judgment.

2. In Criminal Appeal No.34/85 the sole appellant is Narendra Kumar and in Criminal Appeal No.68/85 the sole appellant is Bhulendra Ram. The appellant|in Criminal Appeal No.34/85 has been convicted under Sec.420/34 and 120-B of the Indian Penal Code read with Sec.5 (2) and 5 (1) (d) of the prevention of Corruption Act. He has been sentenced to two years rigorous imprisonment on both the counts, and also to pay a fine of Rs.2,000, in default whereof to undergo further imprisonment of one year. No separate sentence was awarded under Sec.120-B of the Indian Penal Code and the sentences were ordered to run concurrently.

3. In respect of appellant Bhulendra Ram in Criminal Appeal No.68/85, he has been convicted under Sec.420/34 of the Indian Penal Code and sentenced to three years rigorous imprisonment and in addition also to pay a fine of Rs.2,000, in default whereof, to undergo further imprisonment for one year. He also stands convicted under Sec.467/471 and 477-A of the Indian Penal code and Sec.5 (2)/









Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top