SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1988 Supreme(Pat) 215

S.B.SINHA
Jai Kala Devi – Appellant
Versus
Nalini Rajan Prasad Singh – Respondent


Judgment

S.B.Sinha, J.

1. This civil revision petition is directed against an order dated 27-7-1984 passed by Shri Abinasi Saran Lal. Additional District Judge. Sitamarhi in Title Appeal No. 71 of 1972 26 of 1983 whereby and whereunder the said learned Court held that the appeal and consequently the suit have abated in terms of Section 4(c) of the Bihar Consolidation of Holdings and Prevention of Fragmentation Act in respect of Schedule II land. The lands are described in Schedule II of the plaint measuring 7 dhurs bearing plot Nos. 4120 and 4122.

2. According to the learned Court below in terms of the provision of the Bihar Consolidation of Holdings and Prevention of Fragmentation Act the word land has a wide meaning, which includes horticulture land, Kharhaur land with bamboo clumps, pasture land, cultivable land, waste land, homestead, tank, wells and water channels.

3. It is admitted that the aforementioned suit was filed against the defendants on the basis that the defendants encroached upon Schedule II land as described in Schedule II of the plaint in the month of Kartik 1958 and this land includes two jack fruit trees and one mango tree It has further been admitted that the d











Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top