SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1988 Supreme(Pat) 144

S.B.SINHA
Ram Prakash Mahto – Appellant
Versus
State Of Bihar – Respondent


Judgment

S.B.Sinha, J.

1. This writ application is directed against an order dated 30 12.1980, passed by the Collector, Samastipur (respondent no 3) in Suit No. 364 of 1979 whereby and whereunder the respondent No. 3 in purported exercise of power conferred upon him under Sec.32 of the Bihar Consolidation of Holdings and Prevention of Fragmentation Act (hereinafter referred to as the Act) declared the sale deed dated 12.6.1978 as void and ordered the petitioners to pay a fine of Rs. 150.00 as the same was executed without obtaining permission under Sec. 5 of the Act.

2. The facts of the case lie in a very narrow compass. The petitioner No. 2 by registered sale deed dated 12.6.1978 sold 3 kathas 16 dhurs of land for a consideration of Rs. 2000/-. According to the petitioner at that point of time there was no publication of register of lands in terms of Sec.10 (1) of the Act. It however, appears that on 20.3.1979 one Ram Karan Thakur filed an application under Sec.32 of the Act, wherefor a report was called for from the Consolidation Officer, Bibhutipur and on the receipt thereof the notice was directed to be issued against the petitioners. The petitioners have stated that they have n




Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top