SURENDRA NARAIN JHA, NAGENDRA PRASAD SINGH
Nawal Sahni – Appellant
Versus
State Of Bihar – Respondent
Narendra Prasad Singh, J.
1. Whether bail has to be granted, to an accused, under proviso to Sub-section (2) of Sec.167 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (hereinafter referred to as the Code), even after submission of the police report chargesheet (hereinafter referred to as the chargesheet if the chargesheet has been submitted after the period prescribed in the proviso to Sub-section (2) of Sec.167, is the question which has to be answered.
2. The petitioner is an accused for offence under Sec.395 of the Penal Code. The first information report in respect of the occurrence in question was lodged on 8.6.1987. The petitioner was arrested and remanded to jail custody on 21-6-1987. The chargesheet, however, was submitted on 23-9-1987, which was received in the Court of Sub-divisional Judicial Magistrate on 24-9-1987.
3. A prayer to release the petitioner on bail was made after submission of the chargesheet, on the ground that as the chargesheet had not been submitted, within 90 days from the date the petitioner was taken in custody, he was entitled to be released on bail in terms of proviso to Sub-section (2) of Sec.167 of the Code. That prayer was rejected by the learned Magi
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.