SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1988 Supreme(Pat) 196

SURENDRA NARAIN JHA, NAGENDRA PRASAD SINGH
Nawal Sahni – Appellant
Versus
State Of Bihar – Respondent


Judgment

Narendra Prasad Singh, J.

1. Whether bail has to be granted, to an accused, under proviso to Sub-section (2) of Sec.167 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (hereinafter referred to as the Code), even after submission of the police report chargesheet (hereinafter referred to as the chargesheet if the chargesheet has been submitted after the period prescribed in the proviso to Sub-section (2) of Sec.167, is the question which has to be answered.

2. The petitioner is an accused for offence under Sec.395 of the Penal Code. The first information report in respect of the occurrence in question was lodged on 8.6.1987. The petitioner was arrested and remanded to jail custody on 21-6-1987. The chargesheet, however, was submitted on 23-9-1987, which was received in the Court of Sub-divisional Judicial Magistrate on 24-9-1987.

3. A prayer to release the petitioner on bail was made after submission of the chargesheet, on the ground that as the chargesheet had not been submitted, within 90 days from the date the petitioner was taken in custody, he was entitled to be released on bail in terms of proviso to Sub-section (2) of Sec.167 of the Code. That prayer was rejected by the learned Magi




























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top