S.B.SINHA
Ram Singhashan Singh – Appellant
Versus
K. P. Sinha, Dy. Director Consolidation – Respondent
S.B.Sinha, J.
1. As common questions of fact and law arise for consideration in these writ applications, they were heard together and are being disposed of by this common judgment.
2. These writ applications involve a question as to whether the provisions of the Evidence Act apply in relation to a proceeding initiated under the Bihar Consolidation of Holdings and Prevention of Fragmentation Act, 1956 (hereinafter referred to for the sake of brevity as the Act)?
3. For the purpose of deciding the question involved in these writ applications it is not necessary to state the facts in details. However, for a better appreciation of the point involved, the facts of the case as stated in the writ petition in C.W.J.C. No. 3226 of 1987 may be taken into consideration. It is admitted that the petitioner and respondent no. 4 are descendants of their common ancestors. The genealogy of the family is as follows :
Gopal Pathak
|
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | | |
Ram Narain Jai Mangal Ram Brit P
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.