SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1988 Supreme(Pat) 230

S.B.SINHA
Indraman Karan – Appellant
Versus
Bali Ram Singh – Respondent


Judgment

1. This appeal is directed against an order dt. 9th May, 1985, passed by Shri R.V. Ram, Subordinate Judge, Aurangabad, in Title Appeal No. 132 of 1973/32 of 1975 whereby and whereunder the learned Court held that the appeal had abated and thereby it rejected the application filed on behalf of the appellants under S.5 of the Limitation Act for setting aside abatement.

2. It appears that in the said appeal the sole respondent died on 8th Nov., 1984. However, no step was taken by the appellants for substituting the heirs and legal representatives of the aforementioned respondent Dharamdeo Singh. During the course of argument only on 18th April, 1985, the learned counsel for the respondents intimated to the Court that the said respondent died and an application for substitution was filed on the next date, i.e., on 19th April, 1985. The appellant in the aforesaid application stated that the respondent was a resident of a different village and, as such he was not aware of the death of the said respondent.

3. The Court below without considering the aforementioned stand taken on behalf of the appellant rejected the said application. In terms of O.22, R.10A of the Civil P.C. a duty



Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top