SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1988 Supreme(Pat) 352

S.N.JHA, UDAY SINHA
Menospak Engineering (P) Ltd. And Anr. – Appellant
Versus
Bihar State Financial Corporation – Respondent


Judgment

S.N.Jha, J.

1. By this application under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India the petitioners have prayed for quashing of Annexure-1 by which an advertisement under Sec.29 of the State Financial Corporation Act (hereinafter referred to as "the Act") was published calling offers for sale of mortgaged property of the petitioner-company and any subsequent action purported thereto. The petitioners have further prayed for restraining the Respondent ("Bihar State Financial Corporation") from selling the properties including the factory, which had been mortgaged with the Corporation.

2. The facts relevant for the disposal of this application, in short, are that petitioner No. 1 is a private limited company (hereinafter referred to as "the Company"), which was incorporated on 1st April, 1982 under the Companies Act, 1956. The object of the Company was to carry on business as manufactures, exporters, importers, buyers and sellers and dealers in all kinds of machineries and factory implements, and, in particular in diesel engines and electric motors etc.

3. The Respondent Corporation was set up under Sec.3 of the said Act, which is the instrumentality or a device of the















































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top