SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1989 Supreme(Pat) 443

UDAY SINHA
Amrit Kaur – Appellant
Versus
Indrajit Kaur – Respondent


Judgment

1. This is an application for quashing the order of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Gopalganj dated 14-7-1983, by which he took cognizance of the offences u/Ss.494, 420, 409 read with S. 114 of the Indian Penal Code. After taking cognizance, the learned Magistrate issued process against all the fourteen accused mentioned in the complaint. The petitioners name figures at serial No.14 of the complaint.

2. In the complaint filed by the opposite party it was alleged by her that she was the lawfully wedded wife of Sardar Satnam Singh and during the subsistence of the marriage Sardar Satnam Singh married the petitioner. Sardar Satnam Singh and the petitioner thus committed offences u/S. 494 and other Sections of the Indian Penal Code as alleged. The Chief Judicial Magistrate, having taken cognizance the present petitioner has moved this court for quashing the cognizance.

3. The only ground advanced in this application for quashing the order is that the learned Magistrate at Gopalganj had no jurisdiction to take cognizance of offence which had been committed at Pratapgarh in the State of Uttar Pradesh. The averment of the petitioner is that she was residing at Pratapgarh and, there



Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top