SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1989 Supreme(Pat) 143

SATYESHWAR ROY
Tata Robins Fraser Company Ltd. And The Tata Iron And Steel Co. Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
Presiding Officer, Labour Court – Respondent


Judgment

Satyeshwar Roy, J.

1. By this judgment both the writ petitions are being disposed of.

2. In C.W.J.C. No. 93 of 1989(R) respondent No. 2, Singh, was at the relevant time working as Officer-in-Special Duty. According to him, on 2-11-1987 he attended the Labour Court in connection with a case. After he returned to his office, he was called by S. A. Hasan, Executive Vice-President of the Company to his office. He asked Singh to resign as he had no future and there was no need to retain him in service. Singh submitted his resignation which was immediately accepted by Hasan. Singh filed a complaint under Sec.26 of the Bihar Shops and Establishment Act, 1953 (the Shops Act for short), on 3-11-1987, a copy of which is Annexure-5 to C.W.J.C. No. 93 of 1989(R). In the complaint it was stated that Hasan by using force, coercion, threat and intimidation created a situation and forcibly procured his signature on a typed resignation letter. Hasan thereafter handed over the letter of acceptance. Singh did not intend to give up his employment voluntarily. The reason for the action taken by Hasan was not disclosed to Singh. There was no reasonable cause for dispensing with his service and i




























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top