SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1989 Supreme(Pat) 205

UDAY SINHA, BINOD KUMAR
Panchanan Jha – Appellant
Versus
State Of Bihar – Respondent


Judgment

Uday Sinha, J.

1. This is an application under Articles 226 and 227 of the constitution of India, for quashing Annexure-7 dated 23rd March, 1988, issued by Additional Secretary to the Governor, State of Bihar (Respondent No.3)compulsorily retiring the petitioner with effect from 23rd March, 1988, the day the notification was issued. The petitioner has also prayed for a writ of mandamus directing the state of Bihar and Secretary, Cabinet Secretariat and coordination Department (respondents 1 and 2) to accord permission to work as an Officer of the State of Bihar.

2. The petitioner was initially appointed as stenographer Class II in the appointment department of the State Government. Thereafter he was posted in the Relief and Rehabilitation Department of the State of Bihar in February, 1952. In October, 1957, he was transferred and posted in the same capacity in the Finance Department. Subsequently, he worked as stenographer Class I and in that capacity worked till 29-5-1962. It appears that one Jamuna Prasad kara, who was working as Personal Secretary (Hindi) to the Governor, reverted back to the Finance Department and in his stead the petitioner Panchanan Jha was appointed


















































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top