SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1989 Supreme(Pat) 331

S.B.SINHA, B.P.SINGH
Beldih Club – Appellant
Versus
Presiding Officer, Labour Court – Respondent


Judgment

S.B.Sinha, J.

1. In these two writ applications, a common question of law which arises for consideration is as to whether the petitioner club is a shop or establishment within the meaning of the provisions of Bihar Shops and Establishments Act, 1953 (hereinafter referred for the sake of brevity as the Act).

2. In the writ applications, the petitioner has sought for issuance of a writ of certiorari for quashing of the order passed by the respondent No. 1, dated 15-4-1981, whereby and where under the said learned court rejected the application filed on behalf of the petitioner to recall his earlier order dated 9-12-1980 in B. S. and E. Cases Nos. 27 and 30 of 1976 allowing the petition of the concerned workman.

3. The aforementioned cases under the said Act arose out of complaint petitions filed before the respondent No. 1 by the respondent No. 2 of the writ petition against termination of services in terms of Sec. 26 of the said Act and by a judgment dated 9-12-1980 and dated 15-4-1981 their applications were allowed.

4. Before the court below the petitioner took an objection that the petitions under the said Act by the respondent No. 1 were not maintainable as the petitione


















































































































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top