SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1989 Supreme(Pat) 335

PATNA HIGH COURT
N.P.Singh and S.Hoda JJ.
Anil Kumar Sinha
Versus
State Of Bihar
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 7543 of 1988 ;
Decided On : SEPTEMBER 11, 1989

Headnote:Constitution of India-Article 309 - plea for adding teaching experience gained during supernumerary duty in appointment as Associate Professors-State Government order dated 7-9-1973 depriving benefits of teaching experience obtained during supernumerary duty-in absence of rules having been framed in this regard under Article 309, the aforesaid governmental order will be deemed to be binding order governing the conditions of service of Medical Officers posted against teaching posts in different medical colleges. AIR 1973 SC 303; AIR 1967 SC 1910-Relied Upon; AIR 1983 SC 509 - Explained and Distinguished. (Paras 10, 11 & 18).

       Constitution of India-Articles 14, 16 and 226 - Government order prescribing that only persons posted against regular teaching posts shall be entitled to teaching experience and those posted on supernumerary duty would not be entitled thereto-has a rational basis and is not violative of Articles 14 or 16. (Para 13)

       Constitution of India - Article 141 - Judgments of Supreme Court are binding on High Courts but any order which is not a judgment cannot be a binding precedent-it is binding only between parties. AIR 1983 SC 509, S.A. 5 of 1981 (R), C.W.J.C. 643 of 1978 Explained and Distinguished; 1986 PLJR 743. (F.B.)-Relied Upon. (Para 15)

       Constitution of India-Articles 14, 16, and 226 - discrimination cannot be pleaded on basis of an order issued in favour of any other person on extraneous consideration -if a Government order has been relaxed in respect of some, others cannot claim similar relaxation in their cases unless they establish a case of extreme hardship. (Para 18).

       

Judgment

N. P. Singh, J.

1. This application has been filed on behalf of the petitioner for a writ of mandamus directing the respondent-State to count the teaching experience of the petitioner between the period 19-1-1971 to 21-4-1978 and to appoint him as Associate Professor in the Department of Paediatrics, Darbhanga medical College Hospital. At present petitioner is posted as Assistant professor Paediatrics at the said Medical College.

2. The petitioner was appointed as a Civil Assistant Surgeon on 7-7-1962. An order dated 13-1-1971 was issued by the Department of Health saying that the petitioner, who was posted as Demonstrator in the physiology Department at Darbhanga Medical College Hospital, was being transferred from that post and was being posted in the Paediatrics Department of the same Hospital on supernumerary duty. It is the case of the petitioner that pursuant to the aforesaid order he joined the Paediatrics Department and was put on supernumerary duty Yet another order was issued by the Department of Health on 16-10-1971 in respect of the petitioner saying that permission, was being granted to the petitioner to do the duty of Resident Medical Officer in the Paediatrics department of the Darbhanga Medical College Hospital where he had been posted on supernumerary duty. According to the petitioner he did the teachins work in the Paediatrics Department of the aforesaid Medical College hospital from 19-1-1971 to 21-4-1978.

3. The post of Medical Officer on supernumerary duty in different Medical rollers was abolished with effect from 22-4-1978, because of which the petitioner ceased to hold the post of Medical Officer on supernumerary duty in the depnartment of Paediatrics at the said Medical College Hospital with effect from 22-4-1978 Later, in the year 1979, the petitioner was appointed as Registrar and according to him, he continued on the said post till 14-4-1982. On 28-5-1986 he was appointed as Assistant Professor, Paediatrics which post he is holding till the date of the filing of the writ application.

4. The grievance which has been made on behalf of the petitioner is that if the teaching experience gained by the petitioner between the period 19-1-1971 to 21-4-1978 had been taken into account towards the total teaching experience of the petitioner, then he would have been appointed as Associate Professor instead of Assistant Professor.

5. Counter affidavit has been filed on behalf of the State. According to the respondents, the post of Associate Professor in a Medical College in the state of Bihar is a teaching post which is filed up by the promotion from amongst the Assistant Professors in the Department after preparation of a seniority list on the basis of total length of teaching experience acquired against junior teaching posts of Resident, Registrar and Assistant Professor in the speciality in question. It has been asserted that the petitioner did not hold any teaching post during the period 19-1-1971 to 21-4-1978, he had been posted on supernumerary duty during the said period and, in view of Government order dated 7-9-1973, teaching experience can be given only to a Medical officer, who has been posted against a regular teaching post. In that connection it has been pointed out that the junior teaching posts consist of Resident medical Officer and Registrar which are tenure posts for a period of three years, i e. , any persons posted as Resident Medical Officer or Registrar shall be entitled to a teaching experience for a period of three years only. For the purpose of selection for the posts of Resident Medial Officer and Registrar in different specialities applications are invited from the Officers of the Bihar health Services by advertisement and a pauel is prepared on the basis of the criteria laid down for the purpose. From the aforesaid panel, which is really a merit list of the applicants, Medical Officers are posted as Resident Medical officers and Regibtrars in different specialities. It has bee


























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
Judicial Analysis

SupremeToday

SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top