SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1989 Supreme(Pat) 296

UDAY SINHA, S.C.MOOKHERJI
Commissioner Of Income Tax – Appellant
Versus
Bibi Zaibunnisa – Respondent


Judgment

1. This is a reference under Sec. 256(2) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter to be referred to as "the Act"), which relates to the assessment year 1972-73. The questions referred to us for our opinion are as follows :

"1. Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Tribunal has rightly held that the Commissioner of Income-tax acting under Section 263(1) of the Income-tax Act, 1901, could not interfere with an order of assessment made under Sec. 1-13(1) in pursuance of the scheme to help the new taxpayers under the small income group launched by the Government ? 2. Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Tribunal has rightly cancelled the order passed by the Commissioner of Income-tax under Sec. 263(1) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, For the assessment year 1972-73 ?"

2. The assessee was assessed in terms of a scheme brought out by the Central Board of Direct Taxes. The scheme launched by the Government was meant to help new taxpayers under the small income group. In regard to ladies and minors, however, it had been directed in the scheme that the assessment was to be made in terms of Sec. 143 of the Act. The assessee was assesse


Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top