SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1989 Supreme(Pat) 312

S.B.SINHA
Surendra Prasad Saha – Appellant
Versus
State Of Bihar – Respondent


Judgment

1. This application is directed against an order dated 8-4-1985 as contained in Annexure-1 to the writ application whereby and whereunder the District Mining Officer, Giridih informed the petitioner that his application for renewal of the mining lease for mineral sand cannot be renewed in view of the insertion of Rule-11A of the Bihar Minor Mineral Concession Rules, 1972 by the State of Bihar in terms of notification dated 6-11-1984 as contained in Annexure-2 to the writ application which, incidentally was replaced by another notification dated 14-1-1985 as contained in Annexure-2 to the writ application.

2. The facts of the case lie in a very narrow compass.

3. The petitioner was granted a mining lease for the minor mineral sand by reason of registered deed of lease dated 19-5-1980 in respect of an area comprising 11.38 acres of land in village Makatpur and Barmashia for a period of five years commencing from 19. (sic)

4. In terms of the aforementioned deed of lease allegedly the petitioner was entitled to renewal thereof for a further period of five years.

5. Allegedly in terms of the aforementioned deed of mining lease the petitioner filed an application on 16 (sic) for
























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top