SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1989 Supreme(Pat) 40

SURENDRA NARAIN JHA
Satya Narayan Kejriwal – Appellant
Versus
State Of Bihar – Respondent


Judgment

Surendra Narain Jha, J.

1. By this application under Articles 226 and 227 of Constitution of India, the petitioners have prayed for issuance of a writ in the nature of mandamus for quashing the First Information Report giving rise to Ranchi Kotwali P.C. Case No. 0071/1984, dated 3-2-84 and also for quashing of confiscation proceeding and restraining the respondents from taking any action against the petitioners on the basis of the said First Information Report. It was further prayed that the articles seized be released in favour of the petitioners.

2. The petitioners are partners of a registered partnership firm known as M/s. Bharat Oils and registered under the Indian Partnership Act who carries on business of manufacturing and wholesale of edible oil. The said firm holds a licence under the provisions of Bihar Edible Oil Dealers Licensing Order, 1966 (for short the Licensing Order, 1966) which has been renewed from year to year. A renewal application in respect of licence alongwith renewal fee was submitted before the licencing authority annexing the original licence required to be submitted for such renewal.

3. It appears that on 2/3rd February,1984 the Executive Magistr



























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top