SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1990 Supreme(Pat) 168

U.P.SINGH
Jyotindra Sahay – Appellant
Versus
State Of Bihar – Respondent


Judgment

U.P.Singh, J.

1. The petitioner, who retired from the Health Services as Regional Deputy Director on the 30th June, 1986, has claimed payment of full and final pension and gratuity with interest on the delayed payments. Before his retirement, the petitioner submitted all his papers on the 28th June, 1986, regarding pension, gratuity and other retirement benefits. On the 25th January, 1988 the office of the Accountant General, Bihar, issued payment order granting 90% provisional pension which is contained in Annexure 1 to this application.

2. The petitioner started his career as Civil Assistant surgeon in the year 1956 and was promoted, as Civil Surgeon is the year 1985. The petitioner retired from the service on the 30th June, 1986, as Regional Deputy Director, Health Services.

3. Repeatedly, the petitioner requested for payment of full and final pension and gratuity in several communications addressed to the respondents, but he received no reply. The admitted fact is that no recovery proceeding was started or is pending against the petitioner under Rule 43 of the Bihar Pension Rules.

4. After one year of the petitioners retirement, the Deputy Secretary (Health) issued a me









Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top