BINOD KUMAR ROY
Braj Kishore Sinha – Appellant
Versus
Rekha Sinha – Respondent
1. The petitioner assails in this revision application an order restraining him from operating a locker on certain terms and conditions during the pendency of a proceeding u/S. 13 of the Hindu Marriage Act. (hereinafter to be referred to as the Act). Since Opposite party No. 2 is not a necessary party, this revision application is being disposed of at the admission stage itself with consent.
2. The petitioner prayed for dissolution of his marriage and also for granting a decree of divorce against opposite party No. 1 by initiating a proceeding under S. 13 of the Act.
3. The opposite party No. 1 put in a petition supported by her affidavit (Annexure-1) under S. 151 read with Order XXXIX Rules 1 and 2 and S. 94 of the Code of Civil Procedure (hereinafter to be referred to as the Code) for restraining the petitioner from operating Locker No. 105 of the Punjab National Bank, Boring Road Branch, Patna. She alleged that she has kept her ornaments in the said Locker which stands in their joint names and which is operatable jointly by both. The petitioner who has kept the key of the Locker, by bringing the Officers of the said Bank in collusion, wants to take away the ornaments. Sh
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.