SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1990 Supreme(Pat) 257

BINOD KUMAR ROY
Braj Kishore Sinha – Appellant
Versus
Rekha Sinha – Respondent


Judgment

1. The petitioner assails in this revision application an order restraining him from operating a locker on certain terms and conditions during the pendency of a proceeding u/S. 13 of the Hindu Marriage Act. (hereinafter to be referred to as the Act). Since Opposite party No. 2 is not a necessary party, this revision application is being disposed of at the admission stage itself with consent.

2. The petitioner prayed for dissolution of his marriage and also for granting a decree of divorce against opposite party No. 1 by initiating a proceeding under S. 13 of the Act.

3. The opposite party No. 1 put in a petition supported by her affidavit (Annexure-1) under S. 151 read with Order XXXIX Rules 1 and 2 and S. 94 of the Code of Civil Procedure (hereinafter to be referred to as the Code) for restraining the petitioner from operating Locker No. 105 of the Punjab National Bank, Boring Road Branch, Patna. She alleged that she has kept her ornaments in the said Locker which stands in their joint names and which is operatable jointly by both. The petitioner who has kept the key of the Locker, by bringing the Officers of the said Bank in collusion, wants to take away the ornaments. Sh



















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top