SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1990 Supreme(Pat) 269

G.C.BHARUKA, G.G.SOHANI
Commissioner Of Income Tax – Appellant
Versus
Agarwalla Brothers – Respondent


Judgment

G.C.Bharuka, J.

1. The present two tax cases are being disposed of by a common judgment because the answer to the question referred in Tax Case No. 40 of 1978 is intimately dependent on the answer to the question involved and referred in Tax Case No. 39 of 1978. The Income-tax Appellate Tribunal has referred the following questions of law under Sec. 256(1) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as "the Act") only :

"1. Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Tribunal is justified in law in cancelling the entire assessment under Sec. 147(a) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 for the assessment year 1962-63 ? (referred in Tax Case No. 39 of 1978)

2. Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the cancellation of the penalty under Sec. 271(1)(c) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, by the Tribunal was legal ? (referred in Tax Case No. 40 of 1978)."

2. For the assessment year 1962-63 pertaining to the accounting year ending on December 31, 1961, the assessment of the assessee, namely, Agarwalla Brothers, had been completed on May 25, 1964, by determining a loss of Rs. 7,361. During the assessment proceedings as disclosed by the assessee, t










































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top