SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1990 Supreme(Pat) 200

U.P.SINGH, S.B.SANYAL
Brajendra Prasad Poddar – Appellant
Versus
State Of Bihar – Respondent


Judgment

U.P.Singh, J.

1. The petitioners father died on 28th December, 1981, after serving for long seventeen years as Headmaster in she Primary School, Gopiya Toli, Purnia. He left behind his widow, three sons and two daughters. None of them is an earning member. On account of premature death of the petitioners father the economic condition of the family became critical, there being no other source of income. The petitioner, therefore, applied in the form prescribed by the Personal and Administrative Reforms Department on 18th March, 1983 to the District Superintendent of Education, Purnia (Respondent No. 6), for his appointment on the post of s teacher on compassionate ground (Anukarmpa) which was recommended by him and forwarded to the Directorate of Education Bihar, Patna. When the petitioner made that application, he was 17 years of age. The application so forwarded by respondent No. 6 to the Education Department was returned to respondent No. 6 in September, 1983, by the Deputy Director (Primary Education), Bihar, Patna, with an observation that, due to under-age, i.e., below 18 years, the petitioner could not be appointed on the basis of Anukampa (Annexure 3).

2. When the pe









Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top