S.B.Sanyal and U.P.Singh JJ.

1. In this writ application the petitioner seeks a direction tot publication of his result which has been withheld all these long years.

2. It is said that the petitioner appeared in training examination which was held on 29th January, 1973 (Supplementry). The petitioners fees and forma were accepted and he participated in the examination for the session 1970-72. It appears that under certain Government direction the results were directed to be withheld and not to be published probably on the view that the institution was not recognised. The petitioner being aggrieved with that decision has moved this Court even though after long years. The petitioner explains the delay by stating that several writ applications tiled from time to time in the Court by similarly situated students appearing fro en the same institution have been allowed and the petitioner expected that authorities would apply the same principle in his case as well and automatically publish his result.

3. Mr. Rafat Alam appearing on behalf of the Bihar School Examination Board contended that the case of the petitioner is covered by the Full Bench decision of this Court reported in 19