SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1991 Supreme(Pat) 44

NAGENDRA PRASAD SINGH, SATYESHWAR ROY, SACHCHIDANAND JHA
Pancham Singh – Appellant
Versus
State Of Bihar – Respondent


Judgment

N.P.SINGH, J.

1. This writ application has been filed for quashing an order dated 17-5-1990 issued by the Superintending Engineer, Durgawati Construction Circle, Rohtas, cancelling the work order dated 2-3-1990 and the agreement dated 9-3-1990, in respect of the construction of Spill-way of Durgawati Reservoir Project. Petitioner No. 1 is the firm and petitioner No. 2 is the partner of the said firm. Petitioner No. 1, the firm, being the main petitioner, is hereinafter referred to as the petitioner.

2. Tenders were invited for construction of the aforesaid Project. The tender notice was in two parts. Part I related to pre-qualifications of the tenderers. This part of the tender was opened on 15-6-1989. After scrutiny, according to the petitioner, it was found that the petitioner possessed the basic requirements and qualifications under part I of the said tender notice. Part II of the tender notice related to commercial offer containing rates etc. This part was opened on 19-7-1989.

3. It appears that the tenders submitted on behalf of different contractors were placed before the Departmental Tender Committee consisting of Commissioner of Water Resources, the two Engineers-in


























































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top