SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1991 Supreme(Pat) 497

S.B.SINHA
Ram Naresh Singh – Appellant
Versus
State Of Bihar – Respondent


Judgment

S.B.Sinha, J.

1. The petitioner by way of this application under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India prays for issuance of an appropriate writ for quashing an order dated 18-6-1990, as contained in Annexure-2 to the writ application whereby his prayer to rank him in the seniority list of the Forester has been finally rejected.

2. The basic facts of the case are admitted. The petitioner and the respondent Nos. 11 to 13 were appointed in the posts of Forest Guard on 5-5-1973, 24-4-1974, 24-1-1974, and 5-9-1974 respectively.

3. According to the petitioner, the posts of Forester and Forest Guard belong to one cadre being that of the subordinate forest service and are governed by Clause 3.19 of the Bihar Forest Manual, which read as follows: The Subordinate Forest Service comprises of:

(i) Forest Rangers,

(ii) Foresters,

(iii) Forest Guards.

(iv) Other subordinates, namely, Surveyor, Amin, Marking Officer, Felling Observer, Depot Officer, Coupe Overseer, Mines Muharrir, Naka Guard etc.

4. It is further the case of the petitioner that appointment to the post of Forester is governed by Clause 3.21 thereof.

The petitioner contended that the authorities of the State of










































































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top