SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1992 Supreme(Pat) 291

U.P.SINGH, AFTAB ALAM
Urmila Kumari – Appellant
Versus
State Of Bihar – Respondent


Judgment

U. P. Singh, J.

1. This writ application is directed against the order of bihar Public Service Commission dated 10th April, 1991, by which respondent No.3 was recommended appointment against one of the posts of parabhilekhapal/sahayak Parabhilekhapal/research Assistant in the scale of pay of Rs.880-1510/-. The petitioner claims that she should have been recommended for the said post reserved for the Backward category person since she was the only eligible person for being appointed on the said class III post of Parabhilekhapal/sahayak Parabhilekhapal/research Assistant.

2. On the request made by the State of Bihar for sending the names of eligible candidates for filling up the vacant posts in the Cabinet secretariat and Coordination Department, the Bihar Public Service Commission advertised on 22-5-1990 calling applications for a number of posts, including the vacant post of Parabilekhapal/sahayak Parabhilekhapal/researh assistant. It was mentioned that for the aforesaid posts three reserved posts were available, out of which, one post was to be filled up from amongst Backward Category person (Backward Category II ). The only qualification required was a Degree in M. A. in











Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top