SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1992 Supreme(Pat) 289

B.P.SINGH
Rohan Lal Arjun Lal – Appellant
Versus
State Of Bihar – Respondent


Judgment

B.P.Singh, J.

1. In this application under articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India the petitioner has prayed for quashing of the criminal proceeding in Barauni Rail P.S. Case No. 140/90 (G.R. No. 2825/90). The ground on which the petitioner has prayed for quashing of the criminal proceeding is that the proceeding initiated against the petitioner u/s. 7 of the Essential Commodities Act is illegal, and for the same reason the confiscation proceeding initiated against the petitioner u/s. 6A of the Act in Cr. Misc. Case No. 29/90 pending before the Collector, Begusarai is also illegal. It is further prayed that this Court may be pleased to direct release of the sum of Rs. 1,60,560 which represents the sale proceeds of the foodgrains in question, namely wheat, which has been deposited in the Government Treasury.

2. The case of the petitioner is that it is a partnership firm carrying on business as general merchant and common &gent. Its normal place of business is Delhi and it holds a valid licence for carrying on business in wheat under the provisions of the Delhi Wheat (Licensing and Control) Order, 1988, and a copy of the licence issued in its name has been annexed a




Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top