SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1992 Supreme(Pat) 478

G.C.BHARUKA, NARAYAN ROY
Punam Kumari – Appellant
Versus
Lalit Narain Mithila University – Respondent


Judgment

Gopi Chand Bharuka, J.

1. The present writ application has been filed by the petitioner for issuance of a writ of mandamus directing the respondent University to publish her result of B. A. (Hons) Sociology of the session 1988-89.

2. According to the petitioner, She had secured 44, 33 per cent marks in B. A. pass course examination. She was admitted to Honours course by respondent No. 5 Principal of M. J. J. College, Mabarakpur as per the recommendation of the Head of the Department of Sociology. After completion of her course in the college, pursuant to the admit card, she appeard at the examination but the result of the said examination has been detained on the ground that her very admission to the Honours course was contrary to the regulations of the University, since no student securing less than 45% in a particular subject could be admitted to Honours course in that subject. The Regulation 2 (ii) relating to admission in Honours course reads as under:

No candidate shall be allowed to offer Honours course in any subject unless he/she obtained at least 45 per cent marks in that subject at the Bachelor Pass Examination.

3. It may be relevant to state here that since the r














Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top