SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1992 Supreme(Pat) 389

B.P.SINGH, NAGENDRA RAI
Manoj Prasad – Appellant
Versus
Ranchi University – Respondent


Judgment

B.P.Singh and Nagendra Rai JJ.

1. We have heard the counsel for the parties at length, but we find no merit in this petition. We briefly record our reasons.

2. The petitioners claim to be class III and class IV employees of the J. S. College, Daltongaj, a constituent College of the Ranchi University. In the instant petition, they have claimed their wages for the periods from May, 1988 to August 1989 and again from February, 1991 onwards. They claim that though they were appointed against the posts sanctioned by the University in May, 1988, then the Principal of the College stopped payment of wages to them and this compelled them to taken up the matter with the University, Pursuant to an undestanding reached with the University they again started getting their wages from September, 1989 onwards and continued to receive their wages till January, 1991. Again from February, 1992 they are not being paid their wages though they are working against the posts.

3. A counter-affidavit has been filed an behalf of the respondents in which the claim of the petitioners is denied and it is stated that the petitioners have neither been appointed by the University nor by any competent autho









Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top