PATNA HIGH COURT
Nagendra Rai and N.K.Sinha JJ.
Sheo Narayan Gope
Versus
State Of Bihar
Criminal Appeal No. 207 of 1989 ;
Decided On : DECEMBER 2, 1992
CRIMINAL LAW - Murder - Identification of Accused - Delay in Sending FIR - Effect - Seizure List - Absence - Effect - Evidence of Single Eye-Witness - Reliability.
Fact of the Case:
The appellants were convicted of murder, dacoity, and other offenses. The prosecution's case was that the appellants, along with others, came to the informant's house at night and killed his brother. The informant and other witnesses identified the appellants in the torchlight. The appellants' defense was that they were falsely implicated due to enmity.
Finding of the Court:
The court held that the prosecution had proved its case beyond a reasonable doubt. The court found that the informant was a truthful witness who had correctly identified the appellants in the torchlight. The court also found that the medical evidence supported the prosecution's case. The court rejected the appellants' contention that the delay in sending the FIR to the magistrate was fatal to the prosecution's case, holding that such delay alone could not justify the conclusion that the investigation was tainted.
Issues: 1. Whether the prosecution had proved its case beyond a reasonable doubt. 2. Whether the delay in sending the FIR to the magistrate was fatal to the prosecution's case. 3. Whether the absence of a seizure list regarding the torches, boxes, and blood found at the scene of the crime affected the prosecution's case. 4. Whether the evidence of a single eye-witness was reliable.
Ratio Decidendi: 1. The court held that the prosecution had proved its case beyond a reasonable doubt based on the following evidence: (a) the testimony of the informant, who was a truthful witness who had correctly identified the appellants in the torchlight; (b) the medical evidence, which supported the prosecution's case; and (c) the objective findings of the Investigating Officer. 2. The court held that the delay in sending the FIR to the magistrate was not fatal to the prosecution's case, holding that such delay alone could not justify the conclusion that the investigation was tainted. 3. The court held that the absence of a seizure list regarding the torches, boxes, and blood found at the scene of the crime did not affect the prosecution's case, as the Investigating Officer had purposely failed to prepare the seizure lists in order to help the accused persons. 4. The court held that the evidence of a single eye-witness was reliable, as the witness was truthful and had correctly identified the appellants in the torchlight.
Final Decision: The court dismissed the appeal and upheld the convictions of the appellants.
NAGENDRA RAI, J.
1. This appeal arises out of a judgment of conviction dated 5-5-1989, passed by the Addl. Sessions Judge-II, Barh, Patna, in Sessions Trial No. 619/88, by which the appellant Sheo Narain Gope has been convicted under Sections 302, 380 and 148 of the Indian Penal Code and sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for life, two years and one year, respectively. He has also been convicted under Section 27 of the Arms Act and sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for one year. The other three appellants, namely, Ramashray Gope, Binod Gope and Anuj Gope have been convicted under Sections 302/149 and 380 of the Indian Penal Code and sentenced to undergo rigorous imprison ment for life and two years, respectively. Appellant Binod Kumar Gope has been further convicted under Section 148, I.P.C. and Section 27 of the Arms Act and sentenced to undergo one year rigorous imprisonment under each count. Appellants Ramashray Gope and Anuj Gope have been further convicted under Section 147, I.P.C. and sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for one year. All the aforesaid four appellants have been convicted under Section 452, I.P.C. but no separate sentence has been awarded to any of them. All the sentences awarded against the appellants have been ordered to run concurrently.
2. Appellants Sheo Narain Gope and Ramashray Gope are own brothers and, similarly, Binod Gope and Anuj Gope are own brothers.
3. The occurrence took place in the night between 21st and 22nd of February, 1988, at village Gawasa Shekhpura Beldari Tola, P. S. Pandara in the district of Patna. The informant Bishundeo Chauhan (P.W. 11) was sleeping in his Khalihan which is near his house in a Khatia Palani and his brother Chanirak (deceased) was sleeping in the southern side of the same Khalihan in another Palani. At about 12 in the mid night 10-12 persons came near the house of the informent, out of them five persons went towards the Khalihan where Chanirak Chauhan was sleeping and brought Chanirak near the place where the informant was sleeping. There was a scuffle in between Chanirak and the accused persons, as a result of which the informant woke up and noticed that Sheo Narain Gope and Binod Gope both were armed with guns, Ramashray Gope, Anuj Gope and acquitted accused Haran Gope were armed with lathis. The informant raised hulla that his brother was being killed. In the meantime, appellant Sheo Narain Gope fired his gun at his brother Chanirak Chauhan as a result of which he fell down. On hearing the sound of gun-fire the informants brothers wife Gulabi Devi (P.W. 2) opened the door of the house and raised hulla. Thereafter all the five accused entered into the house and assaulted his brothers wife (Bhaujai) by foot and removed five boxes containing clothes, ornaments and cash of Rs. 10 or 12 thousands from the house. Gulabi Devi (P.W. 2) and Kapil Chauhan (P.W. 4) also saw them in the light of the Torch flashed by them. The dacoits, while retreating, exploded, bombs and indulged in firing. All the accused persons had concealed their faces with Gamchha.
4. The motive for the occurrence, according to the prosecution was that two years prior to the occurrence there was an exhange of blows (Marpit) between the informants elder brother Ram-Nandan Chauhan (P.W. 1) and the accused persons. Thereafter, two months prior to the occurrence, the accused persons had assaulted Ram Swaroop Chauhan, cousin brother of the informant, in Punarak Khandha north of the Baniyan tree. The immediate motive for the occurrence was that 5-6 days prior to the occurrence, Krishnanand Beldar (P.W. 3) had removed a handful of peas (Kerao) from the field of acquitted accused Haran Gope for the purpose of eating and for that appellant Anuj Gope gave him two lathi blows and in turn the aforesaid Krishnanand Beldar also gave him a lathi blow. In the evening of the same day, the accused persons brought Krishnanand Beldar to their house and tied him with the pillar. After
AI
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.