G.C.BHARUKA, S.K.CHATTOPADHYAYA
Raj Rani Devi Ramna – Appellant
Versus
Commissioner Of Income Tax – Respondent
G.C.Bharuka, J.
1. This reference made under Sec. 256(1) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter to be referred to as "the Act" only), involves the following questions of law :
" (1) Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the learned Income-tax Officer was justified in including the sum of Rs. 42,000 pertaining to three deeds of sale in the gross receipts for the purposes of computation of capital gains ?
(2) Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the learned Income-tax Officer was legally correct in coming to a finding that once the sale deed was registered, the transfer was complete and any stipulation in the deed of sale to the contrary was irrelevant ?
(3) Whether by mere execution of a deed of sale and registration thereof, there could be transfer of an immovable property without effective conveyance of the same to the transferee ?
(4) Whether, transfer according to Sec. 2(47) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, must mean effective conveyance of the capital asset to the transferee ?"
2. The relevant facts and circumstances of the case lie in a short corn-pass.
The assessee is an individual. During the previous year relating to the as
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.