SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1992 Supreme(Pat) 190

G.C.BHARUKA, S.K.CHATTOPADHYAYA
Raj Rani Devi Ramna – Appellant
Versus
Commissioner Of Income Tax – Respondent


Judgment

G.C.Bharuka, J.

1. This reference made under Sec. 256(1) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter to be referred to as "the Act" only), involves the following questions of law :

" (1) Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the learned Income-tax Officer was justified in including the sum of Rs. 42,000 pertaining to three deeds of sale in the gross receipts for the purposes of computation of capital gains ?

(2) Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the learned Income-tax Officer was legally correct in coming to a finding that once the sale deed was registered, the transfer was complete and any stipulation in the deed of sale to the contrary was irrelevant ?

(3) Whether by mere execution of a deed of sale and registration thereof, there could be transfer of an immovable property without effective conveyance of the same to the transferee ?

(4) Whether, transfer according to Sec. 2(47) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, must mean effective conveyance of the capital asset to the transferee ?"

2. The relevant facts and circumstances of the case lie in a short corn-pass.

The assessee is an individual. During the previous year relating to the as








Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top