SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1993 Supreme(Pat) 78

G.C.BHARUKA
Ajay Kumar Minz – Appellant
Versus
State Of Bihar – Respondent


Judgment

G.C.Bharuka, J.

1. The present writ applications have been filed by the petitioners for quashing of the order dated March 23, 1990 (Annexure-2) by which the respondent Director-General or Police has terminated the appointment of all constables appointed on the basis of selection made between the period October 17, 1989 to October 19, 1989 in the District of Jehanabad.

2. The facts giving rise to the present dispute may first be stated in short. Pursuant to an advertisement made for appointment of constables in the District of Jehanabad, several persons including the petitioners appeared before a Selection Committee between the period October 17, 1989 to October 19, 1989 and after various tests and verifications, on the basis of a panel pre pared by the said Committee, 105 persons were declared to be fit for appointment. A copy of the selection list has been filed as Annexure-1 to the writ application. Out of the said 105 persons, 87 joined the posts pursuant to appointment letters received by them. The remaining 18 persons were not served with the appointment letters and, therefore, there was no occasion for them to join. Thereafter, the impugned letter was is sued terminat













Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top