SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1993 Supreme(Pat) 373

BINOD KUMAR ROY, R.N.PRASAD
Anil Kumar Gupta – Appellant
Versus
State Of Bihar – Respondent


Judgment

B.K.Roy and R.N.Prasad JJ.

1. The petitioner through this writ application filed on 20-10-1992, prays to command the respondents, particularly respondent No. 8, the Sub-divisional Officer, Flood Protection Sub-division, Bihta at Maner, district Patna to immediately vacate his lands measuring 2.82 acres of plot Nos. 156. 263 and 264 appertaining to khata no. 184 in Village Bihta in the district of Patna.

2. From the bulky records of this writ application it transpires that during emergency the land aforementioned as occupied by the Advance Planning and Investigation Division for the temporary use of Sone Embankment Division which was sought to be acquired temporarily under Sec. 35 of the Land Aqcuisition Act, which is clear from a letter of the Special Land Acquisition Officer, Rajbanshi Nagar, Patna bearing No. 802 dated 26-8-76 (as contained in Annexure-B to the counter affidavit), that the acquisition proceedings, however, could not be initiated ; that annual rent of the land was also fixed by the Sub-divisional Officer, Danapur at the rate of Rs. 400 per month ; that subsequently a regular land acquision proceeding was initiated under the provisions of the Land Acquisiti










Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top