The power of review cannot be easily implied when it is not expressly conferred.

B.C.Basak, J.

1. These are series of writ petitions where question of facts and law are generally common and accordingly, they were heard together. However, in this judgment we shall deal with only two of the petitions which relate to Patna University. In these two writ petitions the challenge is against the order of the Patna University demoting the petitioners from the respective posts held by them.

FACTS-C.W.J.C. No. 1921/93

2. In writ petition C.W.J.C. No. 1921 of 1993 the case made out by the petitioners is as follows, The petitioners are 14 in number and they have challenged the order issued by the Patna University dated 15th February, 1993 (Annexure-10 to the writ petition) issued under the signature of the Registrar of Patna University, being respondent No. 7, whereby the promotion of a large number of teachers from the rank and post of Lecturers to the rank and post of Readers in different Departments of the Constituent Colleges of Patna University, including the petitioners, as also to the rank and post of Professors in respect of some of them, under the Statute for Time-Bound Promotion of Lecturers to the post of Readers and for Readers to the post of University Professors (hereinafter referred to as the Time-Bound Promotion Scheme) has been cancelled as a result of which they allege that they have been reverted and reduced in rank and lower scale. The cases of the petitioners are as follows. The petitioners were originally appointed under the Patna University as lecturers temporarily on different dates between 1967 to 1976. Thereafter they were all appointed substantively on permanent basis in the said post of lecturer on the recommendation of the Bihar Public Service Commission (hereinafter referred to as BPSC) with effect from different dates between 1967 and 1980. Thereafter all of them were promoted as Readers provisionally on the recommendation of the Screening Committee with effect from different dates in the years 1985 and 1986. Thereafter upon completion of 10 years continuous service they were appointed to the post of Reader on substantive basis on the recommendation of the Bihar State University (Constituent Colleges) Service Commission (hereinafter referred to as "the Commission") itself by several orders passed in the year 1992 and with effect from the dates of the original appointments as Readers on temporary basis. Further, 5 of them i.e. petitioner No. 1, petitioner No. 4, petitioner No. 8, petitioner No. 9 and petitioner No. 11 were further appointed on promotion provisionally to the post of Professor with effect from different dates in the years 1985 (petitioner No. 4), 1986 (petitioner No. 1), 1988 (petitioner No. 11), 1989 (petitioner No. 9) and 1990 (petitioner No. 8j. The details of such appointments and promotions have been given in the chart being annexure to the petition and supported by different documents which are also annexed. The factual aspects of the matter has not been disputed before us by the respondents. The said Time-Bound Promotion Scheme was framed by the Chancellor on the recommendation of the Bihar later University Board and the approval of the State Government which was circulated by the office of the Chancellor vide letter No. B.S.U.-27/25- 4032 G S. (1) dated 21-12-1986. This Scheme came into effect from 1-124985. By the said Time-Bound Promotion Scheme the provisions for promotion of the Lecturers holding substantive post as Lecturers to the post of Reader were made. The said scheme provides, inter alia, that a Lecturer holding substantive appointment on the post of Lecturer and having completed atleast 10 years of continuous service as Lecturers in one or more University be promoted to the post of Reader on the recommendation of the Commission. It was similarly provided that a Reader possessing the qualification of University Professor prescribed by the University Grant Commission and having completed at least 16 years of continuous service as Lecturer/Reader sha