AFTAB ALAM, S.B.SINHA
Sone Vanaspati – Appellant
Versus
State Of Bihar – Respondent
S.B.Sinha, J.
1. This application is directed against an order as contained in Annexures 6-A and 6-C to the writ application whereby and where under a demand notice had been served upon the petitioner and the assessment proceeding has been directed to be continued.
2. Bereft of all unnecessary details the fact of the matter is as follows:
The petitioner is an existing company, incorporated under the Indian Companies Act, 1956, and carrying on business in Vanaspati at Barun in the district of Aurangabad, whereas its factory is situate.
3. The State adopted a resolution on 21st February, 1990 known as Industrial Policy, 1990 with a view to accelerate growth of Industry in the State of Bihar and by reason thereof a new scheme was inter alia introduced granting benefits of Sales-tax to the small and medium scale industries. The petitioner-Company was incorporated on 31st March, 1990. A term loan of Rs. 5.30 lakhs was sanctioned to the petitioner. A Factory for manufacturing vanaspati was set up at Barun by the petitioner which is a medium scale industry and its trial production started from 21st May, 1993.
4. The State of Bihar again adopted a policy decision on 10th June, 1993
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.