SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Article Pause Article
judgment-img

1994 Supreme(Pat) 101

PATNA HIGH COURT
S.B.Sinha and S.K.Singh JJ.
Bhagalpur University Research Scholars Association
Versus
State Of Bihar
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 13396 of 1992 ;
Decided On : MARCH 9, 1994

The University Grants Commission Act, 1953, being a Central Act enacted under Entry 66, List I of the Seventh Schedule of the Constitution of India, shall override the provisions of the State Acts enacted under Entry No.25 of List III thereof.

Headnote:

UNIVERSITY GRANTS COMMISSION ACT - QUALIFICATION FOR LECTURERS - STATE ACT - OVERRIDING POWER - CENTRAL ACT PREVAILS - NET EXAMINATION MANDATORY - STANDARD OF EDUCATION - EXCLUSIVE FUNCTION OF UGC - NO DEVIATION PERMISSIBLE.

Fact of the Case:

Writ petitions challenging the advertisement issued by the Bihar State University (Constituent College) Service Commission for appointment of Lecturers in different Universities/constituent colleges, which prescribed a minimum qualification of a master's degree with at least 55% marks and holding of M.Phil and Ph.D. on the relevant subject as an additional qualification. The petitioners contended that the qualification prescribed was not in consonance with the standard prescribed by the University Grants Commission (UGC), which had made the National Eligibility Test (NET) mandatory for appointment as lecturers.

Finding of the Court:

The Court held that the University Grants Commission Act, 1953, being a Central Act enacted under Entry 66, List I of the Seventh Schedule of the Constitution of India, shall override the provisions of the Bihar Inter-State University Board Act and the Bihar State Universities Act, 1976, which were enacted by the legislature of Bihar under Entry No.25 of List III thereof. The Court further held that the NET examination, as prescribed by the UGC regulations, was an essential qualification for appointment as a lecturer and that the State could not dispense with it. The Court also held that the entire regulation framed by the UGC was mandatory and that no deviation or departure therefrom was permissible at the instance of the State.

Issues: 1. Whether the qualification prescribed in the advertisement issued by the Bihar State University (Constituent College) Service Commission for appointment of Lecturers was in consonance with the standard prescribed by the University Grants Commission (UGC)? 2. Whether the NET examination, as prescribed by the UGC regulations, was an essential qualification for appointment as a lecturer? 3. Whether the State could dispense with the NET examination?

Ratio Decidendi: 1. The University Grants Commission Act, 1953, being a Central Act enacted under Entry 66, List I of the Seventh Schedule of the Constitution of India, shall override the provisions of the Bihar Inter-State University Board Act and the Bihar State Universities Act, 1976, which were enacted by the legislature of Bihar under Entry No.25 of List III thereof. 2. The NET examination, as prescribed by the UGC regulations, is an essential qualification for appointment as a lecturer. 3. The State cannot dispense with the NET examination.

Final Decision: The writ petitions were allowed, and the respondents were directed to consider the applications of only those candidates who had passed the NET examination in terms of the regulation framed by the University Grants Commission.

Judgment

S. B. Sinha and JJ JJ.

1. - Both these writ applications involving common questions of fact and law were taken up for hearing together and are being disposed of by this common judgment.

2. An advertisement dated 23rd November, 1993, issued by the Bihar state University (Constituent College) Service Commission (hereinafter referred to as the university Service Commission) published in newspaper hindustan whereby and whereunder applications have been invited for appointment to the post of Lecturers in different Universities/constituent colleges, is in question.

3. From a perusal of the said advertisement, it would appear that the minimum qualification required for appointment to the post of Lecturers is a masters degree in the relevant subject having at least minimum 55 per cent marks. Holding of a degree of M. Phil and Ph D. on the relevant subject was to be considered as an additional qualification. It was stated therein that the minimum qualification may he relaxed even in respect of candidates who have research degree like M. Phil/ph D. According to the petitioners the qualificitions prescribed in the said advertisement is not inconsonance with the standard prescribed by the university Grant Commission, whereby eligibility test known as national eligibility Test was prescribed.

4. It has been contended that the University Grants Commission Act 1953 hereinafter referred to as the said Act being an act enacted by the parliament of India in terms of Entry 66, List I of the VIIth Schedule of the constitution of India shall override the provisions of the Bihar Inter-State university Board Act (hereinafter referred to as the Board Act) as also bihar State Universities Act, 1976 (hereinafter referred to as the 1976 Act)which have been enacted by the legislature of Bihar under Entry No.25 of list III thereof.

5. There are 12 Universities in the State of Bihar which are governed by the 1976 Act, apart from the Patna University which is governed by the patna University Act. Sec.57 of the 1976 Act and Sec.56 of the Patna University Act lay down the provisions for appointment in different Universities/constituent colleges. The 1976 Act does not contain any provisions laying down the qualification of any lecturers. Such appointment used to be governed under under the Statute framed by the different Universities, by reason of Bihar Act No.18 of 1993 known as Patna University (Amendment Act 1993) and Bihar Act no.17 of 1993 (known as Bihar State University Amendment Act, 1993), a provision has been made for appointment of persons in a teaching post upon holding a competitive examination to be conducted by the University service commission. The said amendment Acts are contained in Annexures 2 and 3 to the writ applications.

6. Sub-section (2) of Sec.5 of the Act confers overriding power in the State and which reads as follows:-

7. The Parliament had enacted the University Grants Commission 1953 (Act No 3 of 1956) with a view to make provision for co-ordination and determination of the standard in Universities and for that purpose, to establish the University Grants Commission. Sec.26 (1) (e) of the said Act empowers the commission to frame a regulation.

8. In exercise of its aforementioned power the University Grants commission had framed a regulation known as University Grants Commission (A qualification required of a person to be appointed to the teaching staff of a university and institutions affiliated to it) Regulations, 1991.

9. A notification publishing the afore mentioned regulations was issued on 19th September, 1991. The relevant provisions of the Regulations reads thus:-

"3 (A) (a) Arts, Sciences, Social Sciences, Commerce, Education, physical Education, Foreign languages and law. Good academic record with atleast 50 marks or an equivalent grade at master degee level in the relevant subject from an indian University or an equivalent degree from foreign university. Candidates besides fulfilling the above qualifications sho






































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top