SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1994 Supreme(Pat) 39

G.C.BHARUKA
Dilip Kumar Saha – Appellant
Versus
Runnu Sarkar – Respondent


Judgment

G.C.Bharuka, J.

1. This appeal has been filed under Sec. 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 (hereinafter referred to as the Act), only by the owner of the vehicle against the award dated 12.3.1992 passed by the Accidents Claims Tribunal, Dhanbad, in Title (Motor Vehicle) Suit No. 58 of 1989.

2. The appellant is the owner of a truck bearing No. BRY 7343 which was insured with Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd. (respondent No. 2). The said vehicle met with an accident resulting in death of three persons including one Shiban Kumar Sarkar. The present case relates to the claim made by his widow, Runnu Sarkar (respondent No. 1). On appreciation of the evidence the court awarded a sum of Rs. 2,88,000.00 out of which the respondent insurance company was directed to pay Rs. 1,50,000.00 and the rest amount of Rs. 1,38,000.00 has been held to be the liability of the appellant. The Tribunal has not assigned any reason for making this apportionment.

3. Mr. Lal, learned Counsel appearing for the appellant, has assailed the aforesaid apportionment by asserting that under the facts and circumstances of the case, it was incumbent upon the Tribunal to fasten the entire liability on the insurance




























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top