SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1994 Supreme(Pat) 302

P.K.DEB
Mohd. Manir – Appellant
Versus
State Of Bihar – Respondent


Judgment

P.K.Deb, J.

1. This is a petiton under Sec. 482, Cr.P.C. for quashing the order 14-6-1994 passed by the C.J.M. Lohardaga in Lohardaga P.S. Case No. 0067/94, whereby the prayer of the petitioner, an alleged vital witness to the occurrence, for recording his statement under Sec. 164, Cr.P.C. virtually refused when it was asked by the impugned order that the witness must come through Investigating Agency.

2. The question of law in this case involves a very point as to (1) whether statement under Sec. 164, Cr.P.C. can be recorded by a Magistrate on a direct request from the witness concerned, (2) whether the Magistrate is bound to do it or has got a discretion in the matter, (3) whether such statement is recorded without involving Investigating Agency in the matter would amount to interference in the investigation.

3. Mr. T.R. Bajaj, the learned Counsel was appointed amicus curie to help the Court in arriving at a just decision with his vast experience in both Bar and Bench.

4. A brief fact of the case is necessary to be mentioned for appreciating the points of law involved in the case. An information was lodged on 20-5-1994 at Lohardaga P.S. by the one Mohd. Seraj alleging mur
















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top