SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1994 Supreme(Pat) 263

S.K.MUKHERJEE, ASOK KUMAR GANGULY
Asbok Kumar – Appellant
Versus
State Of Bihar – Respondent


Judgment

S. K. Mookerji, A. K. Ganguly, JJ.

1. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and also the learned counsel for the State.

2. The petitioners, Asbok Kumar and thirteen others, by this writ petition, pray for quashing the order dated 30th December, 1992, passed by the Superintending Engineer, Road Construction Department, Road circle, Purnea. The said order is Annexure-11 to this writ petition.

3. By the said impugned order, the service of the petitioners have been terminated.

4. After hearing the learned counsel for the parties and also taking into consideration the materials on record, we are disposing of this writ petition finally at the stage of admission.

5. Briefly stated, the facts of the case are that earlier the petitioners bad filed a writ petition bearing C. W. J. C. No.2460 of 1982 and that writ petition was finally disposed of by this Court by a judgment dated 24-7-1991, a copy whereof is Armexure-5 to this writ petition. It is clear from the said judgment tbat the petitioners were appointed in regular work-charged establishment of the P W D in Araria district in the year 1981 as class IV employees on different post on diverse dates. The appointment of the














Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top