SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1994 Supreme(Pat) 395

ADITYA NARAYAN CHATURVEDI
Surendra Sharma – Appellant
Versus
Jagdish Sharma – Respondent


Judgment

A. N. Chaturvedi, J.

1. This is a petition under Article 329 (B) of the constitution of India read with sections 80 and 81 of the Representation of the Pepoles Act, 1951 for setting aside the election of respondent No.1 jagdish Sharma from 246 Ghoshi Legislative Assembly Constituency and for declaring the election petitioner elected.

2. The case of the election petitioner as made out in the election petition is that by a notification published in the Bihar Gazette (Extra Ordinary) the Assembly Constituencies of Bihar State Legislative Assembly including 246 Ghoshi Assembly Constituency had been called upon to elect members for the purpose of constituting the new Legislative Assembly of the state and the various dates in January and February, 1990 had been fixed for the defferent stages of the election from the aforesaid 246 Goshi Assembly constituency. The election petitioner and several others presented their nomination papers to be candidates. As required by Sec.34 (2) of the representation of the People Act, 1951 the election petitioner deposited Rs.250/- in Government Treasury, Jehanabad. under Treasury Challan in favour of Returing Offier and attached the Treasury Chal


















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top