SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1994 Supreme(Pat) 375

S.K.CHATTOPADHYAYA
New India Assurance Company Limited – Appellant
Versus
Turki Hi Alias Kui – Respondent


Judgment

S.K.Chattopadhyaya, J.

1. This appeal is at the instance of the New India Assurance Co. Ltd. which is directed against the order dated 6.9.1991 passed by the IInd Addl. District Judge-cum-Accidents Claims Tribunal, Chaibasa, in Misc. Compensation Case No. 37 of 1984 by reason of which the Tribunal directed the assurance company to pay a sum of Rs. 15.000.00 as interim compensation to the respondent No. 1, Turki Hi, widow of late Kundia Purty.

2. The facts of this case lie in a narrow compass. Respondent No. 1 filed a claim petition before the Tribunal stating, inter alia, that her husband, Kundia Purty, boarded truck No. BRS 2851 at 4 p.m. on 29.5.1984 for returning home at Chaibasa from Lagra Bajar. On the way, the truck turned upside down due to rash and negligent driving of the truck driver as a result of which the husband of respondent No. 1 died and others sustained injury. Prayer was made before the Tribunal for payment of ad interim compensation under Sec. 92-A of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1939 (hereinafter referred to as the Act). As the ill-fated truck was insured with the appellant company, the claimant made the company a party respondent along with the owner of the










Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top