PATNA HIGH COURT
S.N.Jha and S.J.Mukhopadhaya JJ.
Nagendra Singh
Versus
State Of Bihar
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 9447 of 1994 ;
Decided On : DECEMBER 5, 1994
Election Process - Cooperative Societies - The court set aside the order staying the election process for a primary co-operative society, emphasizing the importance of holding elections for the democratic functioning of cooperative societies.
Fact of the Case:
The Sub-divisional Officer issued an order to hold elections for a primary co-operative society, but later stayed the election process without providing reasons. The court found the order arbitrary and emphasized the importance of holding elections for cooperative societies.
Finding of the Court:
The court set aside the order staying the election process and directed the Sub-divisional Officer to take steps for holding the election by a specified date, emphasizing the democratic foundation of cooperative societies.
Issues: Challenge to order staying election process for a primary co-operative society
Ratio Decidendi: Non-holding of election is contrary to democratic process which is the very foundation of functioning of the cooperative Societies. In the absence of any cogent reason for staying the election process, the order appears to be arbitrary.
Final Decision: The court set aside the order staying the election process and directed the Sub-divisional Officer to take steps for holding the election by a specified date.
S. N. Jha, J.
1. The petitioner has challenged the order of the Sub-divisional Officer, Sikrahna, the authorised to conduct election in respect of primary co-operative societies under Rule 21-B (3) of the Bihar Co-operative societies Rules, 1959 to hold election within his jurisdiction, dated October 3, 1994, staying the election process in respect of Inarwa Phulwar PACS.
2. The said Society is said to be in supersession since. On September 30, 1994, the Sub-divisional Officer issued an order directing the election officer to take steps for holding election of the members and office-bearers of the managing committee of the society. The date of election, accordingly, was fixed on October 30, 1994. However, only three days after issue of the said order i. e. on October 3, 1994 the Sub-divisional Officer passed the impugned order staying the whole election process till further orders.
3. The matter came up for preliminary hearing on November 28, 1994. We gave a weeks time to the learned counsel for the state to find out the reasons for staying the election process. Counsel states that despite communication of the order on wireless, he has not received instructions as yet.
4. Impugned order does not disclose reasons why the election process having once commenced, was stayed. The Society cannot be allowed to remain in supersession for indefinite period Non-holding of election is contrary to democratic process which is the very foundation of functioning of the cooperative Societies. In our opinion, steps for election should have been taken much earlier. Be that as it may, in absence of any cogent reason having been brought to our notice as to why the election process could have been stayed, the order appears to be arbitrary.
5. We, accordingly, set aside the order of the Sub-divisional Officer dated October 3, 1994, and direct him to take steps for holding the election of the members and office-bearers of the managing committee of the society by December 31, 1994.
6. This application is, accordingly, disposed of.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.