SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1995 Supreme(Pat) 639

NARAYAN ROY
Mahadeo Lal Agarwala – Appellant
Versus
State Of Bihar – Respondent


Judgment

Narayan Roy, J.

1. Heard Mr. K.N. Jain, learned senior counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner, and Mr. K.K. Vidyarthi, standing counsel appearing on behalf of the Revenue.

2. This application under Sec. 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure is directed against the order dated March 6, 1987, passed by the learned Special Judge (Economic Offences), Muzaffarpur, in Trial No. 777 of 1987, refusing to discharge the petitioner in a prosecution under Sec. 277 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as "the Act").

3. It appears that the petitioner has been prosecuted for the offence under Sec. 277 of the Act on the ground that the petitioner had fraudulently and dishonestly made a false statement about his income in the verification of his return for the assessment year 1974-75 and thereby dishonestly induced the income-tax authority to assess on lesser amount causing wrongful loss to the Department and wrongful gain to him.

4. Upon the basis of the complaint petition, the learned special judge took cognizance of the offence under Sec. 277 of the Act. It appears that before charge, the petitioner appeared before the learned special judge and prayed for his disch





Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top