SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1995 Supreme(Pat) 92

A.N.TRIVEDI
Laxami Narayan Rice Mills – Appellant
Versus
State Bank Of India, Deoghar – Respondent


Judgment

1. Title (Mortgage) Suit No. 138 of 1986 was filed by the State Bank of India, plaintiff-opposite party, against Laxami Narayan Rice Mill, a partnership firm and its partners Sri Kailash Kumar Khowala and Sri Ram Avtar Khowala which is pending in the Court of Subordinate Judge-V, Deoghar.

2. During the pendency of the suit defendant No. 3 Sri Ram Avtar Khowala died on 18-9-1991. It is claimed on behalf of the petitioners that defendant No. 2, through the other partner of the firm, had duly intimated the fact of the death of defendant on 1-10-1991 to the plaintiff-bank, yet no steps were taken for substitution of the legal heirs of the deceased defendant No. 3 and again on 16-3-1992 information regarding the death of defendant No. 3 was sent to the plaintiff-bank yet again no steps were taken for substitution.

3. It appears that defendants 1 and 2 appeared in the court below on 16-2-1994 after substituted service by publication and filed a petition on 24-5-1994 under O. 22, R. 4 read with S. 151 of the Code of Civil Procedure stating that the suit as a whole has abated on account of non-substitution of the heirs of deceased defendant No. 3. It was stated in that petition tha
















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top