SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1995 Supreme(Pat) 138

B.L.YADAV
Krishna Kumar Agrawal – Appellant
Versus
Jai Kumar Jain – Respondent


Judgment

B.L.Yadav, J.

1. This is defendants Second Appeal filed under Sec. 100 of the Civil Procedure Code (for short "the Code") in a suit filed by the plaintiff-respondents, praying therein that it be declared and decreed that the defendants have got no right to close the windows and ventilators and other openings in the north-eastern wall of the plaintiffs house and the defendants be further restrained from causing diminution in the light and air, to which the plaintiffs are entitled. The plaintiffs have been enjoying the same right for the last more than 12 years. The relief further was for removal of the wall or any other structure made by the defendants adjacent to the wall of the house of the plaintiffs.

2. The plaintiffs-respondents brought this suit with the averment that their grand father has purchased Holding No. 32 in Ward No. 2 in Mohalla Chowk Road under a registered deed of sale dated 19.5.1921 executed by Ram Charan Lal alias Bachu Babu who was the common ancestor of the defendants in favour of Godulal Jain, grand-father of the plaintiffs, who have raised three storeyed building. They have opened windows at the height of 10 ft. This was consistent with the convenan












Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top