SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1995 Supreme(Pat) 137

SURINDER SARUP
Sadanand Singh – Appellant
Versus
State Of Bihar – Respondent


Judgment

Surinder Sarup, J.

1. This appeal is against the judgment of the court of Sri S.N. Mandal, Assistant Sessions Judge, Koderma, dated 5th March, 1994, whereby the appellants, namely, Sadanand Singh, Kameshwar Singh, Dashrath Singh, Mahadeo Singh, Raj Kishore Singh and Kishun Yadav have been convicted under Sec. 395, IPC. Appellant Dashrath Singh has further been convicted under Sec. 412, IPC. They have been sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for 10 years each and to pay a fine of Rs. 100 each and in default to undergo R.I. for one month under Sec. 395, IPC. However, no separate sentence has been awarded against appellant Dashrath Singh, under Sec. 412, IPC.

2. The prosecution case against the appellants is that at about 11.30 p.m. on 24th November, 1992, while the informant Jagdish Yadav was sleeping in his house along with his family members, 3-4 dacoits armed with pistol entered inside the house by scaling the tiled roof and threatened the informant to open the door at the point of pistol. Out of fear, the informant opened the door of the house and the dacoits looted woolen shawl, torch, clothes, ornament and cash belonging to the inmates of the house. Thereafter th












Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top