SUDHANSU JYOTI MUKHOPADHAYA
Uma Kant Jha – Appellant
Versus
Shital Thakur – Respondent
S.J.Mukhopadhaya, J.
1. The petitioners are Defendant Nos. 17 and 18 in the court below. They have challenged the impugned order dated 25th August, 1994 passed in Partition Suit No. 111/71 by the learned Munsif, I. Madhubani.
2. After the preliminary decree made in the partition suit, the survey knowing Pleader Commissioner was appointed. He submitted report. After hearing the objection of all die parties, by the impugned order dated 25th August 1994, the learned Munsif, I, Madhubani has accepted the report of the Pleader Commissioner, namely, Shri Madan Mohan Mishra and confirmed the same.
3. The defendants petitioners have challenged the aforesaid impugned order dated 25th August 1994, by which court below accepted and confirmed the report of the pleader Commissioner, Shri Madan Mohan Mishra; by filing the present Civil revision application.
4. The office of this Court by its stamp report has raised an objection regarding maintainability of the present civil revision application against such order. Counsels on behalf of Opposite Party Nos. 2, 3, 4 and 5 have also raised the question of maintainability of the present civil revision application-. According to the counsel fo
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.