SUDHANSU JYOTI MUKHOPADHAYA, K.VENKATASWAMI
Eureka Forbes Limited – Appellant
Versus
State Of Bihar – Respondent
S.J.Mukhopadhaya, J.
1. All these writ petitions involving common point of law were filed by the same petitioner relating to the assessment of sales tax for different periods, i.e., 1987-88, 1988-89, 1989-90 and 1990-91. Thereby they are disposed of by common orders.
2. Eureka Forbes Ltd., petitioner, a limited company having its office at Patna, Ranchi, Jamshedpur, etc., is doing business of selling vacuum cleaner. Petitioner has challenged notices issued by the respondent-Deputy Commissioner of Commercial Taxes, Jamshedpur, under Sec. 19(1) read with Sec. 17(2) of the Bihar Finance Act, 1981 (annexure 1 series in respective writ petitions) ; orders of reassessment (annexure 2 series of respective writ petitions) and orders passed in revisional applications by the Commissioner of Commercial Taxes, Patna (annexure 3/1), by which the orders of reassessment have been upheld and the revision petitions have been dismissed.
3. The brief facts of the case are as follows :
The assessments with regard to sale of vacuum cleaners for the aforesaid periods, i.e., 1987-88, 1988-89, 1989-90 and 1990-91 were made by the assessing authority treating the vacuum cleaners as "machinery", whi
Assistant Controller Of Estate Duty V/s. Nawab Sir Mir Osman Ali Khan Bahadur
B.C. Malliah V/s. State Of Karnataka
Cit V/s. H.H. Smt. Chand Kanwarji
Commissioner Of Sales Tax, Uttar Pradesh, Lucknow V/s. Kakaram Magharam
Indian And Eastern Newspaper Society V/s. Commissioner Of Income-tax
Indian And Eastern Newspaper Society V/s. Commissioner Of Income-tax, New Delhi
R.K. Malhotra, Ito V/s. Kasturbhai Lalbhai
Vashist Bhargava V/s. Income-tax Officer
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.