B. L. Yadav, J.

1. These three analogous writ petitions have been filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India as Public Interest Litigation (for short P. I. L) and the points involved are similar in nature. Hence it is convenient to dispose them of by this common judgment. These petitions would, however, be referred as first, second and third writ petitions.

2. In the first writ petition filed by Dr. Taj Singh Lakshmana (in person ). Chairman of the Bihar Sick Industries Association the petitioners has stated that about 7000 Entreoreneurs have obtained separate loans from the bihar State Financial Corporation, Frazer Road, Patna (respondent No.2)and separate agreements have been executed in respect of all the Entrepreneurs. But those agreements have not been filed and only one of them was shown in the Court. Nothing can be ascertained with certainty from the alleged prayer made in paragraph 10 of the first writ petition. However, the prayer in the first writ petion is that this Court may treat this petition as a regular writ petition against the Bihar State Financial Corporation (for short "the b S F. C ") and to take necessary action against Shri A. K. Singh, Mana