SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1995 Supreme(Pat) 503

RAM NANDAN PRASAD
Vidya Sagar Rai – Appellant
Versus
Ram Lagan Thakur – Respondent


Judgment

1. This application in revision is directed against the order dated 31.1.1994 passed in Title Suit No.25 ot 1992 whereby the court refused to extend the time for deposit of the balance of the consideration money.

2. The relevant facts of the case are that the petitioner filed the above mentioned suit tor specific performance of contract the suit was decreed on 27.8.1993 with and specific direction to deposit the balance of the consideration money within a period of one month failing which the suit would stand dismissed. The petitioner filed an application for certified copy of the judgment on 28.9.1993. The same was ready orn 17.12.1993 and on the same day it was handed over to the petitioner. Or 18.12.1993 the petitioner filed an applicatiorr tor extension of time stating therein that he had no knowledge with regard to payment of the balance of the consideration money within a month and he knew about the aforesaid condition after obtaining the certified copy of the judgment on 17.12.1993. The court by the impugned order dismissed the said petition for extension of time for deposit of the balance of the consideration money on the ground that the court has become functus off





Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top