S.K.HOMCHAUDHURI
Upendra Prasad – Appellant
Versus
State Of Bihar – Respondent
S. E. Hom Chaudhuri, J.
1. -by this petition under Articles 226, and 227 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner has approached this Court for issuance of in appropriate writ or direction commanding the respondents to take into account the petitioners services rendered as Extra Clerk from the period april, 1957 to 23-1-1981in the establishment of District Registrar, Samastipur before he was absorbed as temporary clerk in the said Department, as qualifying service for pensionary benefit.
2. The undisputed facts in this case are that after being selected, the petitioner was appointed as extra clerk in the office of the District Subregistrar, samastipur on and from in the month of April, 1957 arid he continued to work as extra clerk till he was absorbed as temporary clerk by the order issued under Memo No.172 dated 24-1-1981. While working as temporary clerk, the petitioner was absorbed as permanent clerk ia the said department by the order dated 30-5-1990 and continued to work as such till he retired from service on attaining the age of superannuation and on 31-12-1992. After his retirement, the petitioner was granted pension and pensionary benefit by taking into account
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.