SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1995 Supreme(Pat) 304

S.K.HOMCHAUDHURI
Upendra Prasad – Appellant
Versus
State Of Bihar – Respondent


Judgment

S. E. Hom Chaudhuri, J.

1. -by this petition under Articles 226, and 227 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner has approached this Court for issuance of in appropriate writ or direction commanding the respondents to take into account the petitioners services rendered as Extra Clerk from the period april, 1957 to 23-1-1981in the establishment of District Registrar, Samastipur before he was absorbed as temporary clerk in the said Department, as qualifying service for pensionary benefit.

2. The undisputed facts in this case are that after being selected, the petitioner was appointed as extra clerk in the office of the District Subregistrar, samastipur on and from in the month of April, 1957 arid he continued to work as extra clerk till he was absorbed as temporary clerk by the order issued under Memo No.172 dated 24-1-1981. While working as temporary clerk, the petitioner was absorbed as permanent clerk ia the said department by the order dated 30-5-1990 and continued to work as such till he retired from service on attaining the age of superannuation and on 31-12-1992. After his retirement, the petitioner was granted pension and pensionary benefit by taking into account






















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top